Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The impact of propranolol on the predictive validity of estimated VO2 max by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test: a double-blind crossover study
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Physiology, Nutrition and Biomechanics.ORCID iD: 0009-0006-3187-3236
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Physiology, Nutrition and Biomechanics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0613-4806
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Physical Activity and Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3901-7833
2025 (English)In: Sport Sciences for Health, ISSN 1824-7490, E-ISSN 1825-1234, Vol. 21, no 3, p. 1723-1731Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose Usage of beta-blockers may influence heart rate response during exercise testing. The study aimed to investigate the impact of Propranolol, a non-selective beta-blocker, on the predictive validity of a commonly used submaximal cycle test, the Ekblom-Bak test (EB-test), for the estimation of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max).

Methods The study was a double-blinded crossover study including 28 participants (14 women), aged 21-59 years. VO2 max was estimated by the EB-test and measured during a maximal incremental exercise test during placebo and 10 mg Propranolol beta-blockade condition. The EB-test estimates VO2 max based on the difference in heart rate, Delta HR, between two work rates (4 min cycling on each), a factor corresponding to the higher rate, heart rate at the lower rate, and age.

Results Maximal heart rate (mean +/- SD; 165.5 +/- 16.5 vs. 181.4 +/- 9.8 bpm), Delta HR (36.4 +/- 13.2 vs. 43.0 +/- 11.4 bpm), and measured VO2 max (48.2 +/- 6.2 vs. 50.4 +/- 7.0 ml/kg/min, 3.55 +/- 0.74 vs. 3.67 +/- 0.71 L/min) were significantly lower in the beta-blockade condition compared to placebo (P = < .001). This led to an overestimation of VO2 max by the EB-test during beta-blockade, + 0.377 L/min (95% CI 0.281-0.473 L/min, + 11.2%), with no overestimation seen in the placebo condition, + 0.030 L/min (95% CI (- 0.112)-0.172 L/min + 0.8%). The coefficient of variance, indicating variance of estimated VO2 max on an individual level, was lower during beta-block condition, 6.6%, compared to placebo, 9.9%.

Conclusion The EB-test systematically overestimated VO2 max compared to measured VO2 max during beta-blockade condition. Future research is needed to refine the test equation for usage in populations using beta-blockers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2025. Vol. 21, no 3, p. 1723-1731
Keywords [en]
Sympathetic blockade, Beta-blockade, Oxygen uptake, Submaximal exercise testing, Ekblom-Bak test
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences Physiology and Anatomy
Research subject
Medicine/Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-8685DOI: 10.1007/s11332-025-01396-9ISI: 001467796700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105002606316OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-8685DiVA, id: diva2:1960063
Note

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

Available from: 2025-05-22 Created: 2025-05-22 Last updated: 2025-09-24

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(698 kB)139 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 698 kBChecksum SHA-512
b2f8e7ba22121a4fc3d394e0bebc08ec6d56807417f41efcb9f529b787bbc812c2c6c57eb700119a57547591818010bddf9ae80e40740c3303a25a5339dfa316
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Östh, SimonHelge, TorbjörnEkblom Bak, Elin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Östh, SimonHelge, TorbjörnEkblom Bak, Elin
By organisation
Department of Physiology, Nutrition and BiomechanicsDepartment of Physical Activity and Health
In the same journal
Sport Sciences for Health
Sport and Fitness SciencesPhysiology and Anatomy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 139 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 695 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf