Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessing reliability and factorial validity of the Swedish version of the recovery experience questionnaire adapted for at-work recovery
Department of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden University;Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Uppsala University.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0219-9490
Department of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden University.
Department of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden University.
Department of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden University.
2025 (English)In: Nordic Psychology, ISSN 1901-2276, E-ISSN 1904-0016, p. 1-13Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Recovery from work stress is crucial for health and well-being. While research has strongly focused on recovery processes after the workday, there is increasing recognition of the importance of such processes during work. A challenge in investigating recovery processes at work has been the absence of validated measurement tools. This study developed and examined the psychometric properties of a work context-adapted version of the Swedish version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire (REQ). Data were collected by means of an online survey, consisting of 481 employees at a large-sized company located in a medium-sized community in Sweden, in which the questionnaire was completed at two occasions (269 completed the questionnaire on the first or the second occasion, and 105 participants on both occasions). To determine the best-fitting model, we first conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the a priori model. Both the EFA and the CFA supported the proposed four-factor structure of the scale, consisting of the factors Control, Relaxation, Mastery, and Psychological detachment. High reliability estimates were demonstrated for both internal consistency of the total measure and of each subscale, and test-retest consistency. Furthermore, the measure proved to have good convergent validity and discriminant validity for all factors, except some concern regarding convergent validity for Mastery. Despite the limitations discussed, the findings provide support for the use of the Swedish version of the REQ-W and suggest the development and psychometric testing of translated versions of the REQ-W in other languages.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2025. p. 1-13
Keywords [en]
Work stress recovery, questionnaire, assessment, factor analysis, recovery experiences, recovery experience questionnaire
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-8651DOI: 10.1080/19012276.2025.2483305OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-8651DiVA, id: diva2:1951161
Available from: 2025-04-10 Created: 2025-04-10 Last updated: 2025-09-16

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Almén, Niclas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Almén, Niclas
In the same journal
Nordic Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 179 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf