Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH

System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Estimating the prevalence of athlete burnout based on clinical cut-off scores
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Sport Psychology research group.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2869-8995
Karlstads universitet.
York St John Univeristy.
2019 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Burnout is a psychosocial construct that has been extensively studied in athletes. Burnout is a significant threat to an athlete’s mental health and increases the risk of dropout from sport (Gustafsson, Madigan, & Lundkvist, 2017). However, little is known about prevalence of clinical-levels of burnout in athletes. This study therefore aimed to estimate the prevalence of athlete burnout based on clinical cut-off scores taken from the Shirom Melamed Burnout Questionnaire (SMBQ). To do so, cut-off scores were converted from the SMBQ to the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (ABQ). This provided a cut-off score of 3.14. Data were derived from one cross-sectional sample (N = 1,931) and one 10-week longitudinal sample (N = 186; 10 waves). Analyses focused on the physical and emotional exhaustion subscale of the ABQ. In the longitudinal sample, the stability of the cut-offs was examined (i.e., those athletes scoring over 3.14 for over 50% of the time-points, versus those who never scored above 3.14). For the cross-sectional sample, 13% of athletes scored above the clinical cut-off score. For the longitudinal sample, 7.1% of athletes scored above the cut-off on over 50% of occasions, while 77.6% of athletes never scored above the cut-off score on any occasion. The present findings suggest that the estimated prevalence of athlete burnout differs when cross-sectional data are analysed than when longitudinal data are utilised. The findings reiterate that a significant proportion of athletes are at risk of burnout and that prevalence seem to be similar comparing with student- and working populations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019.
Keywords [en]
Burnout, clinical cut-off, prevalence
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Social Sciences/Humanities
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-5952OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-5952DiVA, id: diva2:1377435
Conference
15th European Congress of Sport & Exercise Psychology, FEPSAC, Munster, Tyskland, 15-19 juli 2019
Available from: 2019-12-11 Created: 2019-12-11 Last updated: 2025-09-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(360 kB)1089 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 360 kBChecksum SHA-512
27de6b9d4958f5a670130e06e9ded0376b37f58e9472c7430b857975f6dc910d5ff7a9332e04b019c1ded29cb3a233316fef901df55333b48bfe2b008df829a6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Lundkvist, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundkvist, Erik
By organisation
Sport Psychology research group
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1089 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1673 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf