1. Aim and Research Questions
Safe sport is a vital component of good governance. Openness and disclosure of harmful practices, such as abuse and misconduct, are essential for preventing, recognizing, and responding to such incidents. This paper seeks to advance the understanding of disclosure processes related to sexual abuse and sexual misconduct within equine sport environments. The paper addresses the following research questions:
RQ1: What are the reported experiences of equine sport participants regarding the disclosure of sexual abuse and misconduct, including their reasons for disclosure or non-disclosure?
RQ2: Drawing on a socioecological framework, what individual/interpersonal, organizational, and cultural factors influence the disclosure of sexual abuse and misconduct in equine sport environments?
2. Theoretical Background and Literature Review
There is increasing awareness of the need to prevent harmful practices and promote safe sport environments, particularly in the context of child protection (Vertommen et al., 2024). This awareness has grown in response to numerous publicized reports of sexual harassment and abuse in sports globally and locally over the past decade. In Sweden and Norway, several incidents of sexual harassment and abuse in equine sport environments, typically involving young girls in vulnerable, subordinate positions, have been reported in recent years. These cases have been characterized by risk factors such as power imbalances, dependency, and isolation, which facilitate abuse in sport and appear to be distinctly pronounced within equine sport (Johansson et al., in preparation). Thus, in this paper we will explore the disclosure of sexual abuse and sexual misconduct within equine sport environments.
A steadily growing body of research demonstrates that sexual and other forms of abuse in sport is widespread and simultaneously rendered invisible, with significant underreporting and non-disclosure (e.g., Tuakli-Wosornu et al., 2024; Strandbu et al., 2023; Sølvberg et al., 2023). Reasons for individuals to hide their experiences for years or never disclose them at all include for example fear of consequences, loss of social support, shame, guilt, and limited knowledge about, or lack of, reporting mechanisms and an overall culture of silence in sport (Johansson, 2022; Solstad, 2019; Sølvberg et al., 2023). Thus, facilitating the disclosure of misconduct and abuse to encourage reporting and help-seeking behaviors is an urgent area of concern for sport practitioners as well as researchers.
Given the inherent social nature of sport, as well as of abuse, maltreatment, and their disclosure, such experiences are understood as socially constructed phenomena. This study employs a theoretical framework of contextual determinants that shape disclosure processes and procedures, drawing on Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory (e.g., Bronfenbrenner, 1979). In line with Tuakli-Wosornu et al. (2024) and their work on interpersonal violence in sport, we adopt the term socioecological to more explicitly foreground the social dimensions of Bronfenbrenner’s theory. Our socioecological framework is underpinned by three distinct yet interrelated levels: (1) individual/interpersonal, (2) organizational, and (3) cultural. The dynamic interactions and cultural dispositions within and between these levels can influence both the likelihood of reporting incidents of abuse and maltreatment, as well as the experiences and consequences—positive or negative—associated with the disclosure processes.
3. Research Design, Methodology, and Data Analysis A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining a retrospective cross-sectional questionnaire study and a qualitative interview study with equine sport participants from Sweden and Norway. The online survey sample was self-selected and consisted of current and former equine sport participants (n = 654). Sexual harassment and abuse were assessed using the 15-item IVACS-Q questionnaire (Hartill et al., 2023). Additionally, interviews were conducted with equine sport participants (n = 20) who had been subjected to SHA and/or sexual misconduct, exploring their lived experiences before, during, and after these incidents. Descriptive statistics of the survey data and thematic analysis of the interview data were conducted. Disclosure was a common theme across both studies, and preliminary results from these data subsets will be presented.
4. Results/Findings and Discussion Preliminary results about disclosure of sexual abuse and misconduct from the survey and interview data will be presented. These findings include the occurrence of reporting sexual abuse and misconduct, and reasons participants chose to disclose or not disclose these incidents in any way. Furthermore, we will share insights from in-depth accounts of disclosure processes within the equine sport environment, including experiences with the reporting systems overseen by equine sport organizations. The findings will be discussed through the lens of the socioecological framework, with an emphasis on promoting disclosure and addressing individual/interpersonal, organizational, and cultural barriers.
5. Conclusion, Contribution, and Implication Conclusions and implications of the preliminary results, particularly in relation to safeguarding and sport governance, will be presented and discussed.
6. References
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Hartill, M., Rulofs, B., Allroggen, M., Demarbaix, S., Diketmüller, R., Lang, M., ... & Vertommen, T. (2023). Prevalence of interpersonal violence against children in sport in six European countries. Child Abuse & Neglect, 146, 106513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106513
Johansson, S. (2022). From policy to practice: Measures against sexual abuse by Swedish sports federations. Frontiers in sports and active living, 4, 841653. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.841653
Johansson, S., Sølvberg, N., Broms, L., Strandbu, Å., & Hedenborg, S. (in preparation). Sexual harassment and abuse in the equine sector.
Solstad, G. M. (2019). Reporting abuse in sport: A question of power? European Journal for Sport and Society, 16(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2019.1655851
Strandbu, Å., Solstad, G. M., Stefansen, K., & Frøyland, L. R. (2023). Seksuell trakassering og andre krenkelser i ungdomsidretten: Forekomst og mønstre i utsatthet. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Ungdomsforskning, 4(1), 1–17.
Sølvberg, N., Torstveit, M. K., Mountjoy, M., Rosenvinge, J. H., Pettersen, G., & Sundgot-Borgen, J. (2023). Sexual harassment and abuse; disclosure and awareness of report-and support resources in Norwegian sport- and non-sport high schools: A prospective exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14,1168423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1168423
Tuakli-Wosornu, Y. A., Burrows, K., Fasting, K., Hartill, M., Hodge, K., Kaufman, K., ... & Rhind, D. J. A. (2024). IOC consensus statement: Interpersonal violence and safeguarding in sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 58(22), 1322–1344. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108766
Vertommen, T., Sølvberg, N., Lang, M., & Kampen, J. K. (2024). Are some sports riskier than others? An investigation into child athlete experiences of interpersonal violence in relation to sport type and gender. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902241290576