Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH

System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
International consensus statement on the design, delivery and evaluation of sport-based interventions aimed at promoting social, psychological and physical well-being in prison
Ulster University-Belfast Campus, Belfast, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4732-7097
Ulster University-Belfast Campus, Belfast, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4234-8753
University of Bath, Bath, UK..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1645-8599
Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland..ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3293-7730
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 14, no 1, article id e075792Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To develop an international consensus statement to advise on designing, delivering and evaluating sport-based interventions (SBIs) aimed at promoting social, psychological and physical well-being in prison.

Design: Modified Delphi using two rounds of survey questionnaires and two consensus workshops.

Participants: A multidisciplinary panel of more than 40 experts from 15 international jurisdictions was formed, including representation from the following groups and stakeholders: professionals working in the justice system; officials from sport federations and organisations; academics with research experience of prisons, secure forensic mental health settings and SBIs; and policy-makers in criminal justice and sport.

Results: A core research team and advisory board developed the initial rationale, statement and survey. This survey produced qualitative data which was analysed thematically. The findings were presented at an in-person workshop. Panellists discussed the findings, and, using a modified nominal group technique, reached a consensus on objectives to be included in a revised statement. The core research team and advisory board revised the statement and recirculated it with a second survey. Findings from the second survey were discussed at a second, virtual, workshop. The core research team and advisory board further revised the consensus statement and recirculated it asking panellists for further comments. This iterative process resulted in seven final statement items; all participants have confirmed that they agreed with the content, objectives and recommendations of the final statement.

Conclusions: The statement can be used to assist those that design, deliver and evaluate SBIs by providing guidance on: (1) minimum levels of competence for those designing and delivering SBIs; (2) the design and delivery of inclusive programmes prioritising disadvantaged groups; and (3) evaluation measures which are carefully calibrated both to capture proposed programme outcomes and to advance an understanding of the systems, processes and experiences of sport engagement in prison.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2024. Vol. 14, no 1, article id e075792
Keywords [en]
FORENSIC MEDICINE, PSYCHIATRY, PUBLIC HEALTH, Protocols & guidelines, SPORTS MEDICINE, Social Interaction
National Category
Psychiatry Sport and Fitness Sciences Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Research subject
Social Sciences/Humanities
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-8115DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075792ISI: 001159018500001PubMedID: 38296285OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-8115DiVA, id: diva2:1838286
Available from: 2024-02-15 Created: 2024-02-15 Last updated: 2025-02-20

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1104 kB)100 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1104 kBChecksum SHA-512
d7495026c6d3f9b8ae40d0c52e35227a909a94f0f6e5bb20b21361449e811aaad761ef2b9d4a2635cd298d2d0058ffe7d3654b23c48808d365522bb4300dd757
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Roe, Daniel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Murray, ConorCoyle, BrendanMorgan, HaydynMarder, IanWoods, DavidHaughey, TandyMaycock, MatthewGenovesi, FedericoMeek, RosieParker, AndrewSmith, AndyKay, ChrisHaudenhuyse, ReinRoe, DanielContreras-Osorio, FalonnMartinez, NagoreMartos-Garcia, DanielWhitley, MeredithNorman, MarkSherry, EmmaAdebayo Aderonmu, KehindeBreslin, Gavin
By organisation
Department of Movement, Culture and Society
In the same journal
BMJ Open
PsychiatrySport and Fitness SciencesPublic Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 102 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 359 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf