Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The influence of a rocking-motion device built into classic cross-country roller-ski bindings on biomechanical, physiological and performance outcomes
Mittuniversitetet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskap.
Mittuniversitetet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskap.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Sports Engineering, ISSN 1369-7072, E-ISSN 1460-2687, Vol. 24, no 1, article id 24Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study aimed to determine whether the recently developed Flow Motion Technology® roller-ski prototype could improve indicators of performance during sub-maximal and maximal cross-country roller skiing. Thirteen national and international cross-country skiers completed 2 experimental trials: 1 with Flow Motion Technology® activated, allowing a rocking motion between the foot and ski binding, and 1 with the foot fixed in a traditional manner. Each trial included 2 sub-maximal bouts using the diagonal-stride and double-poling sub-techniques, as well as a double-poling maximal velocity test and a diagonal-stride 6-min time trial. There were no differences in performance between Flow Motion Technology® and traditional roller skiing during the maximal velocity test or the time trial. However, reductions in mean plantar force during sub-maximal diagonal stride (p = 0.011) and ankle range of motion during sub-maximal (p = 0.010) and maximal (p = 0.041) diagonal stride were observed with Flow Motion Technology® versus traditional roller skiing. This, together with a reduced minimum horizontal distance of the hips in front of the ankles during sub-maximal double poling (p = 0.001), indicated impaired technique with Flow Motion Technology®, which may have contributed to the trend for reduced gross efficiency during double poling with Flow Motion Technology® (pη2 = 0.214). Significant physiological differences included a reduced sub-maximal double poling respiratory exchange ratio (p = 0.03) and a greater maximal heart rate during the time trial (p = 0.014) with Flow Motion Technology®. We conclude that the application of Flow Motion Technology® requires further examination before use in training and competition. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 24, no 1, article id 24
Keywords [en]
Equipment, Gross efficiency, Kinematics, Product development, Technique
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-7846DOI: 10.1007/s12283-021-00361-2ISI: 000712254600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85118270048OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-7846DiVA, id: diva2:1801130
Available from: 2023-09-29 Created: 2023-09-29 Last updated: 2023-09-29

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusFulltext

Authority records

Parry, HenryBuskqvist, AlfredLindblom, HampusOhlsson, MarieMcGawley, Kerry

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Parry, HenryBuskqvist, AlfredLindblom, HampusOhlsson, MarieMcGawley, Kerry
In the same journal
Sports Engineering
Sport and Fitness Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf