Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Benefits of higher resistance-training volume are related to ribosome biogenesis.
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Åstrand Laboratory of Work Physiology, Eva Blomstrand's research group. Section for Health and Exercise Physiology, Department of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Inland Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8360-2100
Section for Health and Exercise Physiology, Department of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Inland Norway.
Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway.
Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Journal of Physiology, ISSN 0022-3751, E-ISSN 1469-7793, Vol. 598, no 3, p. 543-565Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

KEY POINTS: For individuals showing suboptimal adaptations to resistance training, manipulation of training volume is a potential measure to facilitate responses. This remains unexplored. Here, 34 untrained individuals performed contralateral resistance training with moderate and low volume for 12 weeks. Moderate volume led to larger increases in muscle cross-sectional area, strength and type II fibre-type transitions. These changes coincided with greater activation of signalling pathways controlling muscle growth and greater induction of ribosome synthesis. Thirteen and sixteen participants, respectively, displayed clear benefits of moderate-volume training on muscle hypertrophy and strength. This coincided with greater total RNA accumulation in the early-phase of the training period, suggesting that ribosomal biogenesis regulates the dose-response relationship between training volume and muscle hypertrophy. These results demonstrate that there is a dose-dependent relationship between training volume and outcomes. On the individual level, benefits of higher training volume were associated with increased ribosomal biogenesis.

ABSTRACT: Resistance-exercise volume is a determinant of training outcomes. However not all individuals respond in a dose-dependent fashion. In this study, 34 healthy individuals (males n = 16, 23.6 (4.1) years; females n = 18, 22.0 (1.3)) performed moderate- (3 sets per exercise, MOD) and low-volume (1 set, LOW) resistance training in a contralateral fashion for 12 weeks (2-3 sessions × week-1 ). Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and strength were assessed at weeks 0 and 12, along with biopsy sampling (m. Vastus lateralis). Muscle biopsies were also sampled before and one hour after the fifth session (Week 2). MOD resulted in larger increases in muscle CSA (5.2 (3.8)% versus 3.7 (3.7)%, P < 0.001) and strength (3.4-7.7% difference, all P < 0.05. This coincided with greater reductions in type IIX fibres from week 0 to 12 (MOD, -4.6; LOW -3.2%-point), greater phosphorylation of S6-kinase 1 (p85 S6K1Thr412 , 19%; p70 S6K1Thr389 , 58%) and ribosomal protein S6Ser235/236 (37%), greater rested-state total RNA (8.8%) and greater exercise-induced c-Myc mRNA expression (25%; Week 2, all P < 0.05). Thirteen and sixteen participants, respectively, displayed clear benefits in response to MOD on muscle hypertrophy and strength. Benefits were associated with greater accumulation of total RNA at Week 2 in the MOD leg, with every 1% difference increasing the odds of MOD benefit by 7.0% (P = 0.005) and 9.8% (P = 0.002). In conclusion, MOD led to greater functional and biological adaptations than LOW. Associations between dose-dependent total RNA accumulation and increases in muscle mass and strength points to ribosome biogenesis as a determinant of dose-dependent training responses. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2020. Vol. 598, no 3, p. 543-565
National Category
Physiology
Research subject
Medicine/Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-5958DOI: 10.1113/JP278455PubMedID: 31813190OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-5958DiVA, id: diva2:1380141
Available from: 2019-12-18 Created: 2019-12-18 Last updated: 2021-05-17Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Determinants of intra-individual variation in adaptability to resistance training of different volumes
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Determinants of intra-individual variation in adaptability to resistance training of different volumes
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Systematic resistance training positively affects skeletal muscle mass and functional characteristics of the neuro-muscular system. By varying exercise variables such as training volume, the training can be individualized. On what indications such variations should be performed are not clear since individuals vary with regards to volume-dependence in training outcomes such as muscle mass and strength.

The primary aim of this thesis was to relate the adaptive response of low and moderate volume resistance training to individual characteristics in untrained individuals. Secondary aims were to characterize exercise-volume dependence in muscle characteristics and determine a time course profile of ribosomal biogenesis-markers in response to resistance training.

In Study I (Paper I), young, healthy, and previously untrained male and female participants (n = 34) trained for 12 weeks (2-3 sessions x week-1) with low (a single set per exercise) or moderate volume (three sets per exercise) allocated to either leg in a contralateral fashion. Muscle cross-sectional area and strength measurements were made before and after the intervention. Biopsy sampling from m. vastus lateralis was performed before and after the intervention and before and one hour after the fifth session.

Training-induced muscle hypertrophy and strength gains were shown to be volume dependentas both variables increased to a greater extent in response to moderate-volume training. These effects coincided with greater activation of mTORC1 signaling, higher abundance of markers related to ribosomal biogenesis, and greater reduction in fiber-type IIX proportions. Thirteen and sixteen participants, respectively, were identified as having additional benefits of moderate- over low-volume training on muscle hypertrophy and strength. The additional benefit of moderate-volume training for muscle hypertrophy and strength gains was associated with greater accumulation of total RNA at Week 2 in the moderate-volume leg, indicating that the ability to differentiate ribosomal biogenesis in the initial phase predicted long-term benefits of moderate over low training volume.

Based on RNA quality, a subset (n = 25) of participants originally included in Study I was used in a follow-up analysis of transcriptome characteristics (Paper II). Accumulation of RNA due to increased ribosomal biogenesis in response to resistance training led to different amounts of tissue being used in analyses as a fixed amount of total RNA was used in sample preparation. When this was accounted for through normalization strategies, dose-dependent increased expression of genes primarily related to the extracellular matrix was identified after two weeks of training in rested-state muscle. In contrast, after the intervention, no dose-dependencies were observed. When not accounting for the amount of tissue used, results indicated counter intuitive increased expression of genes in the low-volume condition.

Given the apparent importance of ribosomal biogenesis identified in Study I,  Study II (Paper III) aimed to describe a time course of accumulation of markers of ribosomal abundance in response to resistance training. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that fluctuations in training volume and training cessation would be reflected in markers of ribosomal biogenesis.

Eighteen participants were allocated to either a training group (n = 11) or a control group (n = 7). The training group performed unilateral knee extension with constant (6 sets) or variable volume (6, 3, and 9 sets in sessions 1-4, 5-8, and 9-12, respectively). Muscle biopsies were sampled from m vastus lateralis in the training group before and 48 hours after the first session and 48 hours after sessions 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, and after eight days of de-training. Biopsies were also sampled in the control group at baseline, after 48 hours, and after 2-4 weeks.

Twelve resistance-training sessions led to muscle growth and gains in strength in the training group compared to the control group. Training also led to increases in total RNA, ribosomal RNA, increased protein levels of upstream binding factor (UBF), and ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6). Total RNA increased in a curve-linear fashion, most rapidly in response to the first four sessions, followed by a plateau and peak values of ∼50% above baseline values after eight sessions. Variations in training volume did not affect the observed increase in either total RNA or any ribosomal RNA. UBF protein levels were related to total RNA levels after controlling for time. Increases in total RNA levels, in turn, predicted training-induced muscle hypertrophy. After eight days of no training, total RNA and specific ribosomal RNA species decreased without muscle mass changes, indicating reduced concentrations and biosynthesis of ribosomes in response to de-training. These results underline a determinant role for ribosomal biogenesis in resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy and that ribosomal biogenesis is sensitive to training cessation.

Overall, this thesis demonstrates a determining role of ribosomal biogenesis in adaptations to resistance training. In addition, it broadly characterizes the effect of training volume on multiple aspects of skeletal muscle biology.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH, 2021. p. 128
Series
Avhandlingsserie för Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan ; 21
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Research subject
Medicine/Technology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-6691 (URN)978-91-986490-2-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-06-14, Zoom, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-05-17 Created: 2021-05-17 Last updated: 2021-05-21

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(5041 kB)239 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 5041 kBChecksum SHA-512
202c7cf13c946c6c997207f7a7b095e4884e531be865a799d71bc3ac6897fb76cf0819a27536b1fcc2189303af10d36f19352ca32d3b235b8527f5a6e92c66e1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Hammarström, DanielApro, WilliamBlomstrand, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hammarström, DanielApro, WilliamBlomstrand, Eva
By organisation
Eva Blomstrand's research group
In the same journal
Journal of Physiology
Physiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 239 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 382 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf