Exercise self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injury: psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the Exercise Self-Efficacy ScaleShow others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 45, no 4, p. 347-50Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the exercise self-efficacy scale (ESES) in persons with spinal cord injury. This is the first independent study of ESES psychometric properties, and the first report on ESES test-retest reliability. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: A total of 53 Dutch persons with spinal cord injury. METHODS: Subjects completed the Dutch ESES twice, with 2 weeks between (ESES_1 and ESES_2). Subjects also completed the General self-efficacy scale (GSE), and a questionnaire regarding demographic characteristics and lesion characteristics. Psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the ESES were assessed and compared with those of the original English-language version. RESULTS: The Dutch ESES was found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha for ESES_1 = 0.90, ESES_2 = 0.88). Test-retest reliability was adequate (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.89). For validity, a moderate, statistically significant correlation was found between ESES and the GSE (Spearman's rho ESES_1 = 0.52, ESES_2 = 0.66, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the psychometric properties of the Dutch ESES were found to be similar to those of the original English version. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the use of the ESES as a reliable and valid measure of exercise self-efficacy.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 45, no 4, p. 347-50
Keywords [en]
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Exercise, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, *Self Efficacy, Spinal Cord Injuries/*rehabilitation, Surveys and Questionnaires
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-5081DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1112OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-5081DiVA, id: diva2:1158626
Note
Nooijen, Carla F J Post, Marcel W M Spijkerman, Dorien C M Bergen, Michael P Stam, Henk J van den Berg-Emons, Rita J G eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Validation Studies Sweden 2013/03/12 06:00 J Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;45(4):347-50. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1112.
2017-11-202017-11-202020-01-17Bibliographically approved