Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
No Additional Benefits of Block- Over Evenly-Distributed High-Intensity Interval Training within a Polarized Microcycle
Mid Sweden University, Östersund.
Mid Sweden University, Östersund.
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Åstrand Laboratory of Work Physiology. Mid Sweden University, Östersund.
Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Lund University.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Frontiers in Physiology, E-ISSN 1664-042X, Vol. 8, article id 413Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The current study aimed to investigate the responses to block- versus evenly-distributed high-intensity interval training (HIT) within a polarized microcycle. Twenty well-trained junior cross-country skiers (10 males, age 17.6±1.5 and 10 females, age 17.3±1.5) completed two, 3-week periods of training (EVEN and BLOCK) in a randomized, crossover-design study. In EVEN, 3 HIT sessions (5x4-min of diagonal-stride roller-skiing) were completed at a maximal sustainable intensity each week while low-intensity training (LIT) was distributed evenly around the HIT. In BLOCK, the same 9 HIT sessions were completed in the second week while only LIT was completed in the first and third weeks. Heart rate (HR), session ratings of perceived exertion (sRPE) and perceived recovery (pREC) were recorded for all HIT and LIT sessions, while distance covered was recorded for each HIT interval. The recovery-stress questionnaire for athletes (RESTQ-Sport) was completed weekly. Before and after EVEN and BLOCK, resting saliva and muscle samples were collected and an incremental test and 600-m time-trial (TT) were completed. Pre- to post-testing revealed no significant differences between EVEN and BLOCK for changes in resting salivary cortisol, testosterone or IgA, or for changes in muscle capillary density, fiber area, fiber composition, enzyme activity (CS, HAD and PFK) or the protein content of VEGF or PGC-1α. Neither were any differences observed in the changes in skiing economy, VO2max or 600-m time-trial performance between interventions. These findings were coupled with no significant differences between EVEN and BLOCK for distance covered during HIT, summated HR zone scores, total sRPE training load, overall pREC or overall recovery-stress state. However, 600-m TT performance improved from pre- to post-training, irrespective of intervention (P=0.003), and a number of hormonal and muscle biopsy markers were also significantly altered post-training (P<0.05). The current study shows that well-trained junior cross-country skiers are able to complete 9 HIT sessions within one week without compromising total work done and without experiencing greater stress or reduced recovery over a 3-week polarized microcycle. However, the findings do not support block-distributed HIT as a superior method to a more even distribution of HIT in terms of enhancing physiological or performance adaptions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 8, article id 413
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Research subject
Medicine/Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-4934DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00413ISI: 000403515100001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-4934DiVA, id: diva2:1115175
Available from: 2017-06-26 Created: 2017-06-26 Last updated: 2024-01-17

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1307 kB)371 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1307 kBChecksum SHA-512
4c87a614e629699649910eb19846bf3e9f40b854ef8f7cebb07a6c60224ffe93d0947ee1513149622491508e4ee7ece7d5b47f0389f3823dbbf3c1e90e207c3c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textFull text article

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Blomstrand, Eva
By organisation
Åstrand Laboratory of Work Physiology
In the same journal
Frontiers in Physiology
Sport and Fitness Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 371 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 442 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf