Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH

Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Muscular strength and power development to high and low resistance loads in trained individuals.: 8-week intervention
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Sport and Health Sciences.
2017 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Aim

The purpose of this study was to examine high versus low resistance training loads performed to muscular failure and its effect on muscular strength, power and strength endurance.

Method

11 men and 3 women (age 26,4 ±4,4 years, weight 79,9 ±10,7 kg, height 179,4 ±76 cm) were recruited to train for 2 days/week for 8-weeks in the leg press and leg extension. One leg was randomly allocated to a high load (HL) program performing 3-5 reps and the other leg was allocated to the low load (LL) program, performing 20-25 reps. All sets were executed to muscular fatigue. The participants were measured for 1RM strength, strength endurance and muscular power before and after the study.

Results

HL and LL leg significantly improved strength gains in the LP exercise by 20,3%, respectively 21%, P< 0,001, but no difference was noted between legs P= 0,876. HL displayed significant increases in the LE exercise by 10,3%, P< 0,05, while no significant improvement occurred for the LL leg, -2,7%, P> 0,05. Strength remained insignificantly similar between protocols P> 0,05. The mean power results indicated no significant improvements within protocols, HL P= 0,309, LL P= 0,112. There was also no significant difference between the two protocols after the intervention P= 0,646. As for muscular strength endurance, the LL performed more repetitions which was significantly greater than for the HL leg 26,5 reps, respectively 23,9 reps, P= 0,045.

Conclusion

This study concludes that similar strength gains can be accomplished when training with heavier or lighter loads as long as all resistance training is performed to muscular failure. It was also determined that performing lower loads to failure is superior for local strength endurance. Finally, traditional resistance training has no benefit for augmenting muscular power whether training with higher or lighter loads to exhaustion

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017.
Series
Examensarbete ; 2017:47
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Physiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-4911OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-4911DiVA, id: diva2:1108230
Educational program
Fristående kurs
Supervisors
Examiners
Note

Kursen Projektarbete 

Available from: 2017-06-12 Created: 2017-06-12 Last updated: 2019-11-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(419 kB)3455 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 419 kBChecksum SHA-512
b715b0df11c30376849ad773996eb1c25682265826344f99ab4f32c5ca61acf35f26022e97eab7c3d3ac7f5cbea2b1c79ff4a46d5c7b4940021528e9eae46c34
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Sport and Health Sciences
Medical and Health SciencesPhysiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 3466 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 652 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf