Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Biomechanical and physiological implications to running after cycling and strategies to improve cycling to running transition: A systematic review.
La Trobe University, Australia..
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8720-1483
La Trobe University, Australia..
Portugal Football School, Portuguese Football Federation, Portugal; Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, Portugal; CIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Portugal..
2022 (English)In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, ISSN 1440-2440, E-ISSN 1878-1861, Vol. 25, p. 861-866Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review summarises biomechanical, physiological and performance factors affecting running after cycling and explores potential effective strategies to improve performance during running after cycling.

DESIGN: Systematic review.

METHODS: The literature search included all documents available until 14th December 2021 from Medline, CINAHL, SportDiscus, and Scopus. Studies were screened against the Appraisal tool for Cross-sectional Studies to assess methodological quality and risk of bias. After screening the initial 7495 articles identified, fulltext screening was performed on 65 studies, with 39 of these included in the systematic review.

RESULTS: The majority of studies observed detrimental effects, in terms of performance, when running after cycling compared to a control run. Unclear implications were identified from a biomechanical and physiological perspective with studies presenting conflicting evidence due to varied experimental designs. Changes in cycling intensity and cadence have been tested but conflicting evidence was observed in terms of biomechanical, physiological and performance outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: Because methods to simulate cycle to run transition varied between studies, findings were conflicting as to whether running after cycling differed compared to a form of control run. Although most studies presented were rated high to very high quality, it is not possible to state that prior cycling does affect subsequent running, from a physiological point of view, with unclear responses in terms of biomechanical outcomes. In terms of strategies to improve running after cycling, it is unclear if manipulating pedalling cadence or intensity affects subsequent running performance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 25, p. 861-866
Keywords [en]
Bicycle, Duathlon, Run, Triathlon
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Research subject
Medicine/Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-7130DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2022.07.006ISI: 000895469600013PubMedID: 35871903OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-7130DiVA, id: diva2:1697180
Available from: 2022-09-20 Created: 2022-09-20 Last updated: 2023-01-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Jacques, Tiago Canal

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jacques, Tiago Canal
By organisation
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH
In the same journal
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Sport and Fitness Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf