7891011121310 of 34
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Criterion validity of the Ekblom-Bak and the Åstrand submaximal test in an elderly population.
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Åstrand Laboratory of Work Physiology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0958-0094
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Åstrand Laboratory of Work Physiology, Björn Ekblom's research group.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6058-4982 
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Åstrand Laboratory of Work Physiology, Björn Ekblom's research group.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3901-7833
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Laboratory for Biomechanics and Motor Control. Karolinska institutet.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9040-2158
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: European Journal of Applied Physiology, ISSN 1439-6319, E-ISSN 1439-6327Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to validate the submaximal Ekblom-Bak test (EB-test) and the Åstrand test (Å-test) for an elderly population.

METHODS: Participants (n = 104), aged 65-75 years, completed a submaximal aerobic test on a cycle ergometer followed by an individually adjusted indirect calorimetry VO2max test on a treadmill. The HR from the submaximal test was used to estimate VO2max using both the EB-test and Å-test equations.

RESULTS: The correlation between measured and estimated VO2max using the EB method and Å method in women was r = 0.64 and r = 0.58, respectively and in men r = 0.44 and r = 0.44, respectively. In women, the mean difference between estimated and measured VO2max was - 0.02 L min-1 (95% CI - 0.08 to 0.04) for the EB method and - 0.12 L min-1 (95% CI - 0.22 to - 0.02) for the Å method. Corresponding values for men were 0.05 L min-1 (95% CI - 0.04 to 0.14) and - 0.28 L min-1 (95% CI - 0.42 to - 0.14), respectively. However, the EB method was found to overestimate VO2max in men with low fitness and the Å method was found to underestimate VO2max in both women and men. For women, the coefficient of variance was 11.1%, when using the EB method and 19.8% when using the Å method. Corresponding values for men were 11.6% and 18.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The submaximal EB-test is valid for estimating VO2max in elderly women, but not in all elderly men. The Å-test is not valid for estimating VO2max in the elderly.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019.
Keywords [en]
Cardiorespiratory fitness, Elderly, Oxygen uptake, Public health, Submaximal test, Validity
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Research subject
Medicine/Technology; Medicine/Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-5960DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04275-7PubMedID: 31820103OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-5960DiVA, id: diva2:1380263
Available from: 2019-12-18 Created: 2019-12-18 Last updated: 2019-12-18

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(645 kB)8 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 645 kBChecksum SHA-512
83285ca2ef4dcbbfe4f218671f2b05f4c542f5d81ead469677a7de44712e1479497ee69ca687a5dc029050b535681e93c1f52c041a9285c3a1fee5b6855fdd31
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Väisänen, DanielEkblom, ÖrjanEkblom Bak, ElinAndersson, EvaNilsson, JonnaEkblom, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Väisänen, DanielEkblom, ÖrjanEkblom Bak, ElinAndersson, EvaNilsson, JonnaEkblom, Maria
By organisation
Åstrand Laboratory of Work PhysiologyBjörn Ekblom's research groupLaboratory for Biomechanics and Motor Control
In the same journal
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Sport and Fitness Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 8 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
7891011121310 of 34
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf