RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Criterion validity and test-retest reliability of SED-GIH, a single item question for assessment of daily sitting time.
Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH, Institutionen för idrotts- och hälsovetenskap.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-4361-6502
Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH, Institutionen för idrotts- och hälsovetenskap, Åstrandlaboratoriet.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-3185-9702
Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH, Institutionen för idrotts- och hälsovetenskap, Åstrandlaboratoriet.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6058-4982 
Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan, GIH, Institutionen för idrotts- och hälsovetenskap, Forskningsgruppen för idrottspsykologi.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-0079-124x
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2019 (Engelska)Ingår i: BMC Public Health, ISSN 1471-2458, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 19, nr 1, artikel-id 19:17Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour has been closely linked to metabolic and cardiovascular health and is therefore of importance in disease prevention. A user-friendly tool for assessment of sitting time is thus needed. Previous studies concluded that the present tools used to assess a number of sedentary behaviours are more likely to overestimate sitting than single-item questions which often underestimate sitting time, and that categorical answering options are recommended. In line with this, the single-item question with categorical answering options, SED-GIH, was developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the criterion validity of the SED-GIH question using activPAL3 micro as the criterion measure. The second aim was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the SED-GIH questionnaire.

METHOD: In the validity section of this study, 284 middle-aged adults answered a web questionnaire, which included SED-GIH, wore activPAL and filled in a diary log for one week. Spearman's rho assessed the relationship between the SED-GIH answers and the daily average sitting time as monitored by the activPAL (activPAL-SIT), a Weighted Kappa assessed the agreement, ANOVA assessed differences in activPAL-SIT between the SED-GIH answer categories, and a Chi2 compared the proportions of hazardous sitters between the different SED-GIH answer categories. In the reliability section, 95 elderly participants answered the SED-GIH question twice, with a mean interval of 5.2 days. The reliability was assessed with ICC and a weighted Kappa.

RESULTS: The SED-GIH question correlated moderately with activPAL-SIT (rho = 0.31), with a poor agreement (weighted Kappa 0.12). In total, 40.8% underestimated and 22.2% overestimated their sitting time. The ANOVA showed significant differences in activPAL-SIT between the different SED-GIH answer categories (p < 0.001). The Chi2 showed a significant difference in proportion of individuals sitting more than 10 h per day within each SED-GIH answer category. ICC for the test-retest reliability of SED-GIH was excellent with ICC = 0.86, and the weighted Kappa showed an agreement of 0.77.

CONCLUSIONS: The unanchored single item SED-GIH question showed excellent reliability but poor validity in the investigated populations. Validity and reliability of SED-GIH is in line with other questionnaires that are commonly used when assessing sitting time.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
BioMed Central, 2019. Vol. 19, nr 1, artikel-id 19:17
Nyckelord [en]
Adults, Office-based work, Older adults, Reliability, Sedentary behaviour, Sitting, Validity, activPAL
Nationell ämneskategori
Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi
Forskningsämne
Medicin/Teknik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-5520DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6329-1PubMedID: 30611226OAI: oai:DiVA.org:gih-5520DiVA, id: diva2:1276428
Tillgänglig från: 2019-01-08 Skapad: 2019-01-08 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-01-08

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(1367 kB)21 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 1367 kBChecksumma SHA-512
39490c3654d70317aea7bde43f864da1512c99611e54fd180cbe84172c8df6d91ba32180f82fdf15b1b57c269f3f294eab657b71e2aa53f9676df068a0fcf238
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Personposter BETA

Larsson, KristinaKallings, LenaEkblom, ÖrjanBlom, VictoriaAndersson, EvaEkblom, Maria

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Larsson, KristinaKallings, LenaEkblom, ÖrjanBlom, VictoriaAndersson, EvaEkblom, Maria
Av organisationen
Institutionen för idrotts- och hälsovetenskapÅstrandlaboratorietForskningsgruppen för idrottspsykologiLaboratoriet för biomekanik och motorisk kontroll (BMC)
I samma tidskrift
BMC Public Health
Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 21 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 260 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf